Audio Technica AT2035 Vs Blue Yeti – Read This Before Buying!

At2035 vs Blue Yeti is another issue that most microphone buyers have to deal with. Both products are popular and have their own benefits with no compromise on quality. Some buyers find it confusing and are often looking for reasons to pick one brand over another. There is a market for both brands and they have a following of users sharing the pros and cons of both microphones.

The following is a comparison of the Audio Technica AT2035 Vs Blue Yeti discuss the features and operations of both mics to make it easier to check the brands.

 Audio Technica AT2035Blue Yeti
Polar Patterns
cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
Frequency Response
20Hz - 20kHz
20Hz - 20kHz
Sample Rate
48 kHz
Bit Rate
16 bit
148 dB SPL, 1 kHz at 1% T.H.D.;158 dB SPL, with 10 dB pad (nominal)Max SPL: 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)
System Requirements
n/aAll modern Windows and Mac OS, USB 1.1/2.0, 64 MB RAM

  • Very affordable studio condenser

  • Wide dynamic range

  • Pivoting stand mount

  • Includes protective pouch

  • Built rugged

  • Heavy duty stand

  • Mute button

  • Gain control

  • 4 pattern mode selection switch

  • Zero latency headphone input

1 year2 years

AT2035 Features

The AT2035 USB microphone is a strong recording device that outputs goof sound quality. The device is compatible with both Windows and Mac. It allows recording for multiple purposes including the podcast, voice cover, and in-house recordings. It uses cardio polar patterns to get the desired sound effects by reducing the sound from the back and surrounding of the sound. You will not have to worry about abrupt sounds around the source of the recording.

The features of AT2035 includes cardioid recording patterns, a minimum frequency response of 20Hz, and the most frequency response of 20KHz. The microphone supports a large diaphragm to record natural sound and low noise. It offers good versatility and manages a wide range. The device is compatible with both Windows and Mac.

Blue Yeti Features

The Blue Yeti supports three capsules and has a setting for four patterns. This one mic is equal to having four mics in hand. It comes with a simple plug-and-play USB functionality and features the latest A-D converter chip and has a separate analog circuit support used to fuse studio mixers.

The Blue Yeti is compatible with different versions of Windows including Windows 10, Windows 8, Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP, and Mac OS. It needs a RAM of 64 MB to function properly. (remove existing and upload)

With the Blue Yeti, there is no compromise on the sound quality and it supports features such as the built-in amplifier for the headphones and separate control for adjusting headphone volume. It offers controls for patterns selections, microphone gain and has a mute button. It is a good recording device that records professional sound from a setting of a home.

The features of Blue Yeti includes cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, omnidirectional sound patterns, a minimum frequency response of 20Hz, and the most frequency response of 20KHz, easy setup and a hassle-free arrangement to run and operate the device.

At2035 vs Blue Yeti: The Functions of Microphones

The At2035 gives low noise, functions on the cardioid pattern is a versatile USB microphone at a low price. It has a good frequency response and bass tone is kept consistent all through the recording. The audio quality is clear and it has a strong build quality. The AT2035 is an innovative device and has to offer a lot for such an affordable price. When compared with the AT2020 this model has a larger diaphragm, and deliver a better response than the earlier model.

The Blue Yeti is easy to use and sound quality is high. It is preferred recorder for podcasts and the feature to have multiple recording patterns makes it a fully adaptive sound recorder for different sounds recording. The device has manual switches for all the patterns and is strong in recording piano and vocal music. Overall it offers great sound quality for a USB recorder. However, sometimes the amount of background noise can limit the sound quality and the mic is limited to solo use only.

Where the Blue Yeti is limited is its ability to counter the background noises. The Blue Yeti often picks up background noise and there is not much one can do to avoid the background clutter. Whereas the AT2035 is less sensitive to background noises and it is easier to record in front of the microphone as the AT2035 will pick the voice and will not be sensitive to background voices. For sound recording, podcasting, and voice captures the AT2035 is a good pick. Since it uses the cardioid polar pattern exclusively it allows for high level of podcast recordings. The device also supports a high-quality shock mount which is an added advantage. The AT2035 is a good effort, combining good USB microphone recording and high sound quality into an affordable package. Due to its price and functionality, it is often preferred over the Blue Yeti for simple musical and instrumental recording.

However, in comparison, the Blue Yeti remains the popular USB microphone. The obvious reason is its sturdy design, fine aesthetics, and four patters design to record four separate settings. They are cheaper and are available in 9 different colors. You can get the Yeti in a blackout, platinum, vintage white, silver, midnight blue, satin red, slate, space grey, and whiteout. They are a good option to record vocals, musical instruments, podcasts, interviews, online gaming, and conference calls.

Both the Blue Yeti and the AT2035 comes with a warranty period of two years. The former can cost anywhere between $100 to $130, and AT2035 costs anywhere between $140 to $170. There are many online retail stores that are offering both the USB microphones. Mostly if you are a beginner and are looking for good recording option comparable to a studio recording with versatility than the Blue Yeti features more options and recording styles. It is an all-round USB recorder that has the features to carry the recordings to a professional level without having to head for a studio.

Users are divided in their opinion for both devices. Some have acknowledged the superior sound quality of the Blue Yeti but have complained about its limitation of blocking background noise. However, most users are overall satisfied with the performance of the Blue Yeti Meanwhile, users have shown an inclination towards the AT2035 for recording music beats and for instrument recording. For an entry-level, both microphones are a good option for professional recording without having to pay a lot and get a solid output.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *